c1d0eb3891
Same discriminant as the Android client - "/api/v1/repos/" in the URL - so one address tells both ends which transport to speak, and nothing new appears in Settings beyond a placeholder and a warning. The bridge stays shared. Three things differ, and they are confined: the header is "token <PAT>" rather than Basic (Gitea answers a silent 401 to the other), a PUT carries a JSON envelope with the file base64-encoded inside it, and the connection test uses GET because the contents API does not answer HEAD. The sha does the ETag's whole job. It comes back from the pull, rides in the PUT body instead of an If-Match, and a stale one earns a 409 - handled exactly like WebDAV's 412, by re-running pull->merge->push so the other device's changes are folded in rather than clobbered. On a first push `sha` is OMITTED rather than sent empty: Gitea reads its presence as "replace that exact version". `branch` is omitted too, so the repo's default is used instead of a name we would be guessing. A failing PUT now reads its response body: Gitea explains a 409 or a 422 there, and without it the error was just a number. The test button checks the SHAPE of what came back, not only the status. A URL one path segment off answers 200 with valid JSON that is not a file - which would otherwise surface much later as "wrong sync password" and send you looking on the wrong side. Four tests cover that parsing, including the line-wrapped base64 Gitea sends and the array an accidental directory URL returns. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>